Aplicación de Tutela de Derechos y protección de derechos fundamentales del imputado en los Juzgados de Investigación Preparatoria de Trujillo
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
“La investigación tuvo como objetivo principal determinar si la figura de tutela de derechos protegió adecuadamente los derechos fundamentales de los imputados en los Juzgados de Investigación Preparatoria de Trujillo, en el periodo abril de 2015 hasta 2019. Su metodología fue de tipo aplicada, con un enfoque de tipo cuantitativo y un alcance descriptivo. Con una muestra de estudio de 30 resoluciones de tutela de derechos en los procesos penales de los Juzgados de Investigación Preparatoria de Trujillo en el periodo abril de 2015 hasta 2019. Teniendo como resultado que el 28 % de las resoluciones protegió adecuadamente los derechos fundamentales de los imputados, en tanto que el 72 % de estas no los protegió adecuadamente. Llegando a la conclusión que esto se debía a que los magistrados no tuvieron criterio adecuado respecto de los presupuestos de procedencia, realizando una interpretación restrictiva del artículo 71° inciso 2 del Nuevo Código Procesal Penal, y a que las solicitudes planteadas por los abogados carecían de congruencia entre la fundamentación fáctica y jurídica e invocaron derechos que poseían vía propia con la finalidad de dilatar el proceso.”
ABSTRACT “The main objective of the investigation was to determine if the figure of Guardianship of Rights adequately protected the fundamental rights of the accused in the Trujillo Preparatory Investigation Courts, in the period from April 2015 to 2019. Its methodology was of an applied type, with a of a quantitative type and a descriptive scope. With a study sample of 30 resolutions of protection of rights in the criminal proceedings of the Trujillo Preparatory Investigation Courts in the period from April 2015 to 2019. Having as a result that 28% of the resolutions adequately protected the fundamental rights of the charged, while 72% of these did not adequately protect them. Concluding that this was due to the fact that the magistrates did not have a uniform criterion regarding the assumptions of origin, carrying out a restrictive interpretation of article 71, paragraph 2 of the New Code of Criminal Procedure, and that the requests made by the lawyers lacked consistency between the factual and legal grounds and invoked rights that had their own way in order to delay the process.”
ABSTRACT “The main objective of the investigation was to determine if the figure of Guardianship of Rights adequately protected the fundamental rights of the accused in the Trujillo Preparatory Investigation Courts, in the period from April 2015 to 2019. Its methodology was of an applied type, with a of a quantitative type and a descriptive scope. With a study sample of 30 resolutions of protection of rights in the criminal proceedings of the Trujillo Preparatory Investigation Courts in the period from April 2015 to 2019. Having as a result that 28% of the resolutions adequately protected the fundamental rights of the charged, while 72% of these did not adequately protect them. Concluding that this was due to the fact that the magistrates did not have a uniform criterion regarding the assumptions of origin, carrying out a restrictive interpretation of article 71, paragraph 2 of the New Code of Criminal Procedure, and that the requests made by the lawyers lacked consistency between the factual and legal grounds and invoked rights that had their own way in order to delay the process.”
Description
Keywords
Tutela de derechos, Derechos fundamentales, Proceso penal