La participación en el delito de negociación incompatible
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
La presente tesis investiga el acierto de la adopción jurisprudencial y doctrinal en sistema jurídico peruano, del criterio de la imposibilidad de punir al tercero respecto al delito de negociación incompatible. Como objetivo general de esta investigación tenemos: Determinar si es posible la participación de un tercero en todas las modalidades del delito de negociación incompatible del ódigo Penal peruano de 1991. Como objetivos específicos tenemos: Describir cual es la postura de la doctrina, legislación comparada, encuestados, Corte Suprema, y, finalmente, la postura del nuestro Código penal en cuanto a la imposibilidad de la participación de un tercero en todas las modalidades del delito de negociación incompatible en el Perú. El presente trabajo es esencialmente descriptivo, y se utilizó la técnica de fichaje, archivo, ya sea, textual, resumen, y análisis del contenido para procesar y ordenar la información obtenida. Luego de los hallazgos y discusión, se concluyó que, no es posible la participación de un tercero en todas las modalidades del delito de negociación incompatible en el Perú, debido a que la complicidad del extraneus en el delito de negociación incompatible no se encuentra contemplada dentro del tipo penal, y al ser un delito especial solo le compete a un funcionario o servidor público con vinculo funcional, imposibilitando la potestad sancionadora del Estado, debido a que, no se puede sancionar una acción que no se encuentre regulada o prevista en la ley.
ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the success of the jurisprudential and doctrinal adoption in the Peruvian legal system, of the criterion of the impossibility of punishing the third party regarding the crime of incompatible negotiation. As a general objective of this investigation, we have: To determine if it is possible the participation of a third party in all the modalities of the crime of ncompatible negotiation of the Peruvian Penal Code of 1991. As specific objectives we have: Describe the position of the doctrine, comparative legislation, respondents, Supreme Court, and, finally, the position of our Criminal Code regarding the impossibility of the participation of a third party in all forms of the crime of Incompatible negotiation in Peru. The present work is scarcely descriptive, and the technique of signing, archiving, either textual, summary, and content analysis was extracted to process and order the information obtained. After the findings and discussion, it was concluded that the participation of a third party in all forms of the crime of incompatible negotiation in Peru is not possible, because the complicity of the stranger in the crime of incompatible negotiation is not contemplated within of the criminal type, and being a special one, it only falls to a public official or servant with a functional link, making it impossible for the State to sanction, because an action that is not regulated or provided for in the law cannot be sanctioned.
ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the success of the jurisprudential and doctrinal adoption in the Peruvian legal system, of the criterion of the impossibility of punishing the third party regarding the crime of incompatible negotiation. As a general objective of this investigation, we have: To determine if it is possible the participation of a third party in all the modalities of the crime of ncompatible negotiation of the Peruvian Penal Code of 1991. As specific objectives we have: Describe the position of the doctrine, comparative legislation, respondents, Supreme Court, and, finally, the position of our Criminal Code regarding the impossibility of the participation of a third party in all forms of the crime of Incompatible negotiation in Peru. The present work is scarcely descriptive, and the technique of signing, archiving, either textual, summary, and content analysis was extracted to process and order the information obtained. After the findings and discussion, it was concluded that the participation of a third party in all forms of the crime of incompatible negotiation in Peru is not possible, because the complicity of the stranger in the crime of incompatible negotiation is not contemplated within of the criminal type, and being a special one, it only falls to a public official or servant with a functional link, making it impossible for the State to sanction, because an action that is not regulated or provided for in the law cannot be sanctioned.
Description
Keywords
Negociación incompatible, Participación, Delito