El non bis in idem en la potestad sancionadora plural de la administración pública
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
El Non Bis In Idem o Ne Bis In Idem, insurge en la vida jurídica, en el Derecho Romano y adquiere una significación especial, en el ámbito del Derecho Penal, para impedir la doble persecución y sanción, en aquellos casos, que se hayan cometido un delito. Posteriormente aparece en el ámbito del Derecho Administrativo Sancionador, en el caso peruano, con la Ley N° 27444, Art. 230, inciso 10 y actualmente está previsto en el Texto Único Ordenado, Decreto Supremo N° 004- 2019-JUS, de la Ley citada, en el Art. 248, inciso 11. La investigación sobre el Non Bis In Idem, aplicando los métodos inductivo – deductivo, analítico y sintético y las técnicas de interpretación jurídica y acopio documental, se encamina a sostener, que solo es aplicable este instituto jurídico, a una de las expresiones de la Potestad Sancionadora Administrativa Peruana: la correctiva, que recae en los ciudadanos de un país
y a los extranjeros que residen y/o están de paso, mas, no es, para los trabajadores del sector público, que están inmersos en una triple responsabilidad: administrativa, civil y penal, como consecuencia de una sujeción especial, cuando ejercitan la función pública. Se precisa también que la potestad sancionadora administrativa peruana, no es dual, sino plural: Correctiva, Disciplinaria, Ética y de Responsabilidad Administrativa Funcional y cada una de estas ´potestades sancionadoras, tiene su propia Ley, Principios, Ilícitos y Procedimientos, siendo así el Non Bis In Idem, solo es aplicable por mandato expreso de la Ley, a la Potestad Sancionadora Correctiva, mas no a la Disciplinaria, Ética y de Responsabilidad administrativa Funcional, por los fundamentos doctrinarios y normativos, que se señalan, en la presente investigación.
ABSTRAC Non Bis In Idem or Ne Bis In Idem, is an insurrection in the juridical life, in the Roman Law and acquires a special meaning, in the field of the Criminal Law, to prevent the double persecution and sanction, in those cases, that a crime has been committed. Subsequently, it appears in the field of Administrative Law, in the Peruvian case, with Law No. 27444, Art. 230, paragraph 10 and currently it is provided for in the Single Ordered Text, Supreme Decree No. 004-2019-JUS, of the cited law, in Art. 248, paragraph 11. The research on Non Bis In Idem, applying the inductive-deductive, analytical and synthetic methods and the techniques of legal interpretation and documentary collection, is aimed at sustaining that only this legal institute is applicable to one of the expressions of the Peruvian Administrative Sanctioning Authority: the corrective one, that falls on the citizens of a country and to the foreigners who reside and/or are in transit, but, it is not, for the workers of the public sector, who are immersed in a triple responsibility: administrative, civil and penal, as a result of a special subjection, when they exercise the public function. It is also specified that the Peruvian administrative sanctioning power is not dual, but plural: Corrective, Disciplinary, Ethical and Functional Administrative Responsibility, and each of these "sanctioning powers" has its own law, principles, offences and procedures.
ABSTRAC Non Bis In Idem or Ne Bis In Idem, is an insurrection in the juridical life, in the Roman Law and acquires a special meaning, in the field of the Criminal Law, to prevent the double persecution and sanction, in those cases, that a crime has been committed. Subsequently, it appears in the field of Administrative Law, in the Peruvian case, with Law No. 27444, Art. 230, paragraph 10 and currently it is provided for in the Single Ordered Text, Supreme Decree No. 004-2019-JUS, of the cited law, in Art. 248, paragraph 11. The research on Non Bis In Idem, applying the inductive-deductive, analytical and synthetic methods and the techniques of legal interpretation and documentary collection, is aimed at sustaining that only this legal institute is applicable to one of the expressions of the Peruvian Administrative Sanctioning Authority: the corrective one, that falls on the citizens of a country and to the foreigners who reside and/or are in transit, but, it is not, for the workers of the public sector, who are immersed in a triple responsibility: administrative, civil and penal, as a result of a special subjection, when they exercise the public function. It is also specified that the Peruvian administrative sanctioning power is not dual, but plural: Corrective, Disciplinary, Ethical and Functional Administrative Responsibility, and each of these "sanctioning powers" has its own law, principles, offences and procedures.
Description
Keywords
Vertiente material, Vertiente procesal, Sujeción especial, Competencia positiva