Análisis de la improcedencia de la nulidad de acto jurídico contenido en escritura pública otorgada por mandato judicial
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
La presente investigación realiza un análisis crítico al criterio jurisdiccional supremo que declara improcedente la demanda de nulidad de acto jurídico que fue formalizado como consecuencia de una sentencia estimatoria en un proceso de otorgamiento de escritura pública, bajo el argumento que el petitorio es jurídicamente imposible, causal de improcedencia prevista en el inciso 5 del artículo 427 del Código Procesal Civil. En nuestra opinión, este criterio jurisdiccional contraviene el ordenamiento jurídico civil, tanto procesal como sustantivo, por lo que, a través de la investigación se busca demostrar que la acción de nulidad de acto jurídico contenido en escritura pública otorgada por mandato judicial no se encuentra inmersa en ninguna causal de improcedencia. Por tanto, debe admitirse la demanda y resolverse el fondo de la controversia, garantizando de este modo el derecho a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva, sin que ello suponga la vulneración a la garantía de cosa juzgada como lo ha interpretado las Salas Supremas en las Casaciones N°1161-2017-Lima y N°1628-2017-Ica.
ABSTRACT This research makes a critical analysis of the supreme jurisdictional criterion that declares inadmissible the claim for nullity of a legal act that was formalized as a consequence of a favorable judgment in a process of granting a public deed, under the argument that the petition is legally impossible, a ground of inadmissibility provided for in paragraph 5 of article 427 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In our opinion, this jurisdictional criterion contravenes the civil legal system, both procedural and substantive, therefore, through the investigation we seek to demonstrate that the action of nullity of a legal act contained in a public deed granted by court order is not immersed in any ground of inadmissibility. Therefore, the claim must be admitted and the merits of the controversy must be resolved, thus guaranteeing the right to effective jurisdictional protection, without this implying the violation of the guarantee of res judicata as interpreted by the Supreme Courts in Cassations N° 1161-2017-Lima and N° 1628-2017-Ica.
ABSTRACT This research makes a critical analysis of the supreme jurisdictional criterion that declares inadmissible the claim for nullity of a legal act that was formalized as a consequence of a favorable judgment in a process of granting a public deed, under the argument that the petition is legally impossible, a ground of inadmissibility provided for in paragraph 5 of article 427 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In our opinion, this jurisdictional criterion contravenes the civil legal system, both procedural and substantive, therefore, through the investigation we seek to demonstrate that the action of nullity of a legal act contained in a public deed granted by court order is not immersed in any ground of inadmissibility. Therefore, the claim must be admitted and the merits of the controversy must be resolved, thus guaranteeing the right to effective jurisdictional protection, without this implying the violation of the guarantee of res judicata as interpreted by the Supreme Courts in Cassations N° 1161-2017-Lima and N° 1628-2017-Ica.
Description
Keywords
Nulidad de acto jurídico, Improcedencia, Petitorio jurídicamente imposible, Otorgamiento de escritura pública