Falta de proporcionalidad en la regulación de los plazos para los procesos de crimen organizado en el Código Procesal Penal
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
La actual investigación se titula: “Falta de proporcionalidad en la regulación de los plazos para los procesos de crimen organizado en el Código Procesal Penal”, y donde se desarrolló sobre la falta de proporcionalidad para regular plazos en casos de crimen organizado en el CPP, respecto a los plazos de procesos comunes y complejos; específicamente se investigó sobre el plazo de la prisión preventiva con la investigación preparatoria, sobre el control de plazo para concluir investigación preparatoria tras disponerse la conclusión de la misma, y sobre el plazo para observar la acusación en casos de crimen organizado, en relación con los casos comunes y complejos. Se investigó realizando un análisis comparativo de cómo se dan los plazos de determinados actos procesales en casos de crimen organizado, en relación con el mismo acto procesal, pero en casos comunes y complejos; el mismo que se realizó con las normas establecidas en nuestro Código Procesal Penal. Siendo que, tras ello, se llegó a establecer como conclusión principal que, para delimitar adecuadamente un plazo para casos de crimen organizado, resulta insuficiente sólo realizarla aplicando una medición lineal-temporal del plazo; ya que, para respetar los plazos razonables de los mismos (desde su vertiente de la proporcionalidad del plazo), se deberá de incorporar además una medición paralela-temporal; ello a fin de que, un acto procesal penal determinado se fije tomando en consideración el tiempo en el que podrá realizarse (medición lineal-temporal), pero, también el tiempo fijado para el mismo acto procesal en relación con los otros tipos de procesos -“común, complejo, o de crimen organizado”- (medición paralela-temporal), para arribar así, a un plazo razonable y que se respete la proporcionalidad del plazo.
The current investigation is entitled: "Lack of proportionality in the regulation of deadlines for organized crime proceedings in the Code of Criminal Procedure", and where the lack of proportionality in regulating deadlines in organized crime cases in the Code of Criminal Procedure was developed, with respect to the deadlines for common and complex proceedings; specifically, the time limit for pre-trial detention with the preparatory investigation, the control of the deadline to conclude the preparatory investigation after the conclusion of the same, and the deadline to observe the accusation in organized crime cases, in relation to common and complex cases. A comparative analysis of the time limits for certain procedural acts in cases of organized crime, in relation to the same procedural act, but in common and complex cases, was carried out with the norms established in our Code of Criminal Procedure. After this, the main conclusion was that, in order to adequately delimit a time limit for organized crime cases, it is insufficient to apply only a linear-temporal measurement of the time limit; since, in order to respect the reasonable time limits (from the perspective of the proportionality of the time limit), a parallel-temporal measurement must also be incorporated; This is so that a given criminal procedural act is fixed taking into consideration the time in which it can be carried out (linear-temporal measurement), but also the time fixed for the same procedural act in relation to the other types of proceedings - "common, complex, or organized crime"- (parallel-temporal measurement), in order to arrive at a reasonable time limit and to respect the proportionality of the time limit.
The current investigation is entitled: "Lack of proportionality in the regulation of deadlines for organized crime proceedings in the Code of Criminal Procedure", and where the lack of proportionality in regulating deadlines in organized crime cases in the Code of Criminal Procedure was developed, with respect to the deadlines for common and complex proceedings; specifically, the time limit for pre-trial detention with the preparatory investigation, the control of the deadline to conclude the preparatory investigation after the conclusion of the same, and the deadline to observe the accusation in organized crime cases, in relation to common and complex cases. A comparative analysis of the time limits for certain procedural acts in cases of organized crime, in relation to the same procedural act, but in common and complex cases, was carried out with the norms established in our Code of Criminal Procedure. After this, the main conclusion was that, in order to adequately delimit a time limit for organized crime cases, it is insufficient to apply only a linear-temporal measurement of the time limit; since, in order to respect the reasonable time limits (from the perspective of the proportionality of the time limit), a parallel-temporal measurement must also be incorporated; This is so that a given criminal procedural act is fixed taking into consideration the time in which it can be carried out (linear-temporal measurement), but also the time fixed for the same procedural act in relation to the other types of proceedings - "common, complex, or organized crime"- (parallel-temporal measurement), in order to arrive at a reasonable time limit and to respect the proportionality of the time limit.
Description
Keywords
HUMANITIES and RELIGION::History and philosophy subjects::History subjects::History