Inconstitucionalidad de la competencia territorial en los procesos contenciosos administrativos contra INDECOPI en la ciudad de Trujillo
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
El Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual - INDECOPI, es una institución pública desconcentrada que tiene alcance a nivel nacional, sobre ello, los artículos 3° y 18.2° del Decreto Legislativo N° 1033, norma que regula su Reglamento de organización y Funciones, prescribe que, no se podrá recurrir al Poder Judicial en tanto no se haya agotado previamente la vía administrativa. No obstante, el artículo 18°, inciso 1° del Texto Único Ordenado de la Ley del Proceso Contencioso Administrativo, Ley N° 27584; señala que, la demanda que cuestiona una resolución administrativa firme, puede ser presentada en un plazo máximo de tres (03) meses, asimismo, en estos casos, la competencia territorial es determinada según el artículo 10°, de la norma mencionada, que dispone como competente para conocer esta materia, al Juez del lugar del domicilio del demandado o en su defecto el lugar donde se produjo la actuación materia del litigio o silencio administrativo; en ese sentido, mediante un análisis normativo y de casos concretos desarrollados en la actividad jurisdiccional, demostramos que los artículos 3° y 18.2° del Decreto Legislativo N° 1033, atentan contra principios constitucionales;
ABSTRACT The National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property - INDECOPI, is a decentralized public institution with national reach. In this regard, Articles 3 and 18.2 of Legislative Decree No. 1033, the regulation that governs its Organization and Functions Regulations, stipulates that the Judiciary may not be appealed to until the administrative route has been previously exhausted. However, article 18, paragraph 1 of the Consolidated Text of the Law on Administrative Litigation, Law No. 27584, states that the claim that questions a firm administrative resolution may be filed within a maximum period of three (03) months. In these cases, territorial jurisdiction is determined according to artic le 10 of the aforementioned rule, which establishes the Judge of the place of domicile of the defendant as competent to hear this matter, or failing that, the place where the action subject to the litigation or administrative silence took place; in this regard, through a regulatory analysis and specific cases developed in the jurisdictional activity, we demonstrate that articles 3 and 18.2 of Legislative Decree No. 1033 violate constitutional principles;
ABSTRACT The National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property - INDECOPI, is a decentralized public institution with national reach. In this regard, Articles 3 and 18.2 of Legislative Decree No. 1033, the regulation that governs its Organization and Functions Regulations, stipulates that the Judiciary may not be appealed to until the administrative route has been previously exhausted. However, article 18, paragraph 1 of the Consolidated Text of the Law on Administrative Litigation, Law No. 27584, states that the claim that questions a firm administrative resolution may be filed within a maximum period of three (03) months. In these cases, territorial jurisdiction is determined according to artic le 10 of the aforementioned rule, which establishes the Judge of the place of domicile of the defendant as competent to hear this matter, or failing that, the place where the action subject to the litigation or administrative silence took place; in this regard, through a regulatory analysis and specific cases developed in the jurisdictional activity, we demonstrate that articles 3 and 18.2 of Legislative Decree No. 1033 violate constitutional principles;
Description
Keywords
Acceso a la justicia, Tutela jurisdiccional efectiva, Proceso contencioso Administrativo, Igualdad Procesal