Tolerancia cero de alcohol en la sangre para una mayor severidad del delito de conducción en estado de ebriedad
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
Se investigó para determinar de qué manera, la permisión de conducir hasta con 0.5 gramos/litro de alcohol en la sangre y la insuficiencia de la penalidad, influyen en el elevado índice de concurrencia del delito de conducción en estado de ebriedad en el Perú. Para la obtención de datos se consideró una muestra conformada por 05 procesos por conducir en esta de ebriedad, en el periodo 2012-2020, con aplicación del principio de oportunidad. Complementada con la legislación comparada; el Informe Estadístico I Semestre 2020 de los siniestros de tránsito por conducir en estado de ebriedad; y por 80 abogados penalistas del Colegio de Abogados de La Libertad, para conocer sus opiniones respecto a la problemática estudiada. Para la selección de la muestra documental y personal se utilizó el muestreo no probabilístico intencional. La técnica utilizada en este estudio fue un análisis documental porque ayuda a comprender el estado actual de las variables de estudio, y se tuvo como instrumento un registro u guía documentaria, como una herramienta de recopilación de información para obtener respuestas importantes a los objetivos propuestos, empleando por método de investigación el deductivo y descriptivo. Finalmente, se concluyó que: La permisión de conducir hasta con 0.5 gramos/litro de alcohol en la sangre, la insuficiencia de la penalidad, la aplicación del principio de oportunidad por la que el representante de Ministerio Público no ejerce la acción penal, y la posibilidad de un acuerdo reparatorio que concluye anticipadamente el proceso, no siendo equitativo con las consecuencias ocasionadas, influye en el elevado índice de concurrencia del delito de conducción en estado de ebriedad, en el Perú.
It was investigated to determine how, the permission to drive with up to 0.5 grams/liter of alcohol in the blood and the insufficiency of the penalty, influenced the high rate of concurrence of the crime of driving while intoxicated in Peru. To obtain data, a sample consisting of 05 processes for driving while intoxicated was expected, in the period 2012-2020, with application of the principle of opportunity. Complemented with comparative legislation; the Statistical Report I Semester 2020 of traffic accidents due to driving while intoxicated; and by 80 criminal lawyers from the La Libertad Bar Association, to find out their opinions regarding the problem studied. For the selection of the documentary and personal sample, the intentional non-probabilistic sampling was obtained. The technique used in this study was a documentary analysis because it helps to understand the current state of the study variables, and a documentary record or guide was used as an instrument, as a tool for collecting information to obtain important answers to the proposed objectives. using the deductive and descriptive research method. Finally, it was concluded that: The permission to drive with up to 0.5 grams/liter of alcohol in the blood, the insufficiency of the penalty, the application of the principle of opportunity by which the representative of the Public Ministry does not exercise criminal action, and the possibility of a reparation agreement that concludes the process in advance, not being equitable with the consequences caused, influences the high rate of concurrence of the crime of driving while intoxicated, in Peru.
It was investigated to determine how, the permission to drive with up to 0.5 grams/liter of alcohol in the blood and the insufficiency of the penalty, influenced the high rate of concurrence of the crime of driving while intoxicated in Peru. To obtain data, a sample consisting of 05 processes for driving while intoxicated was expected, in the period 2012-2020, with application of the principle of opportunity. Complemented with comparative legislation; the Statistical Report I Semester 2020 of traffic accidents due to driving while intoxicated; and by 80 criminal lawyers from the La Libertad Bar Association, to find out their opinions regarding the problem studied. For the selection of the documentary and personal sample, the intentional non-probabilistic sampling was obtained. The technique used in this study was a documentary analysis because it helps to understand the current state of the study variables, and a documentary record or guide was used as an instrument, as a tool for collecting information to obtain important answers to the proposed objectives. using the deductive and descriptive research method. Finally, it was concluded that: The permission to drive with up to 0.5 grams/liter of alcohol in the blood, the insufficiency of the penalty, the application of the principle of opportunity by which the representative of the Public Ministry does not exercise criminal action, and the possibility of a reparation agreement that concludes the process in advance, not being equitable with the consequences caused, influences the high rate of concurrence of the crime of driving while intoxicated, in Peru.
Description
Keywords
Derecho Penal, Delito de conducción en estado de ebriedad, Principio de oportunidad