Ambigüedad del constructo circunstancias comprobables en la vigente Ley de Contrataciones de Perú y su afectación a los proveedores
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
El presente trabajo tiene como objeto determinar la ambigüedad del constructo circunstancias comprobables, el cual se encuentra prescrito en el artículo 11 inciso 1 literal o) de la Ley 30225 Ley de Contrataciones del Estado. El procedimiento para demostrar lo señalado, fue contar con todas las resoluciones del Tribunal de Contrataciones del Estado emitidas durante el periodo 2018-2019, para lo cual adicionalmente se trabajó con el método exegético, lo que permitió demostrar los diferentes pronunciamientos del Tribunal de Contrataciones del Estado en sus resoluciones, las cuales no encuentran un consenso respecto de lo que se debe entender por circunstancias comprobables; asimismo, se advierte que el constructo faculta al TCE para que de manera discrecional considere diversas circunstancias comprobables, transgrediendo así preceptos constitucionales y legales que afectan en mayor incidencia a los proveedores.
ABSTRACT The purpose of this work is to determine the ambiguity of the verifiable circumstances construct, which is prescribed in article 11, subsection 1, literal o) of Law 30225, State Contracting Law. The procedure to demonstrate the aforementioned was to have all the resolutions of the Tribunal de Contrataciones del Estado issued during the 2018-2019 period, for which additionally the exegetical method was worked, which allowed to demonstrate the different pronouncements of the Tribunal de Contrataciones del Estado. State in its resolutions, which do not find a consensus regarding what should be understood by verifiable circumstances; Likewise, it is noted that the construct empowers the TCE to consider various verifiable circumstances in a discretionary manner, thus violating constitutional and legal precepts
ABSTRACT The purpose of this work is to determine the ambiguity of the verifiable circumstances construct, which is prescribed in article 11, subsection 1, literal o) of Law 30225, State Contracting Law. The procedure to demonstrate the aforementioned was to have all the resolutions of the Tribunal de Contrataciones del Estado issued during the 2018-2019 period, for which additionally the exegetical method was worked, which allowed to demonstrate the different pronouncements of the Tribunal de Contrataciones del Estado. State in its resolutions, which do not find a consensus regarding what should be understood by verifiable circumstances; Likewise, it is noted that the construct empowers the TCE to consider various verifiable circumstances in a discretionary manner, thus violating constitutional and legal precepts
Description
Keywords
Circunstancias comprobables, Impedimento, Facultad discrecional, Contrataciones del Estado