Anulación de laudos arbitrales por defectos de motivación atribuibles a sentencias judiciales
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
La presente investigación tuvo por objeto analizar si se debe o no anular un laudo arbitral por defectos de motivación atribuibles a sentencias judiciales, en virtud de este problema se desarrollaron en el marco teórico tópicos tales como: el Derecho de Motivación en un proceso judicial, el Arbitraje y la motivación de laudos arbitrales. Además, se aplicaron los métodos científico, inductivo, deductivo, sintético, hermenéutico-jurídico, así como, las técnicas de observación, análisis documental, fichaje, cuestionario, interpretación normativa; todo lo que incidió en el análisis de la jurisprudencia en torno a la anulación de laudos arbitrales por defectos en su motivación que son atribuibles a sentencias judiciales, concluyéndose que los vicios de la motivación no deben anular laudos arbitrales porque hacen referencia al “contenido constitucionalmente garantizado del derecho a la motivación de las resoluciones judiciales” y la motivación de los laudos no tiene protección
constitucional a través del debido proceso ni éstos son equiparables a las sentencias judiciales y, finalmente, al no establecerse en consideración de la jurisdicción arbitral, el control judicial requerido para su identificación excede de las prohibiciones legalmente impuestas, así como, de los principios rectores del proceso arbitral; con excepción del supuesto de inexistencia de motivación, pues, el control judicial del laudo está limitado a la existencia de argumentos para justificar la decisión.
ABSTRACT The purpose of this investigation was to analyze whether or not an arbitration award should be annulled due to motivational defects attributable to judicial decisions; by virtue of this problem, topics were developed in the theoretical framework, such as: The Right of Motivation in a judicial process, the Arbitration and the motivation of arbitral awards. In addition, scientific, inductive, deductive, synthetic, hermeneutical-legal methods were applied, as well as, observation techniques, documentary analysis, signing, questionnaire, normative interpretation; everything that influenced the analysis of the jurisprudence regarding the annulment of arbitral awards due to defects in their motivation that are attributable to judicial decisions, concluding that the vices of the motivation should not annul arbitration awards, because they refer to the "Constitutionally guaranteed content of the right to motivate judicial resolutions" and the motivation of the awards does not have constitutional protection through due process, nor are they comparable to the judicial sentences and, finally, by not establishing in consideration of the arbitral jurisdiction, the judicial control required for its dentification exceeds the legally imposed prohibitions, as well as, the guiding principles of the arbitration process; with the exception of the assumption of non-existence of motivation, then, judicial control of the award is limited to the existence of arguments to justify the decision.
ABSTRACT The purpose of this investigation was to analyze whether or not an arbitration award should be annulled due to motivational defects attributable to judicial decisions; by virtue of this problem, topics were developed in the theoretical framework, such as: The Right of Motivation in a judicial process, the Arbitration and the motivation of arbitral awards. In addition, scientific, inductive, deductive, synthetic, hermeneutical-legal methods were applied, as well as, observation techniques, documentary analysis, signing, questionnaire, normative interpretation; everything that influenced the analysis of the jurisprudence regarding the annulment of arbitral awards due to defects in their motivation that are attributable to judicial decisions, concluding that the vices of the motivation should not annul arbitration awards, because they refer to the "Constitutionally guaranteed content of the right to motivate judicial resolutions" and the motivation of the awards does not have constitutional protection through due process, nor are they comparable to the judicial sentences and, finally, by not establishing in consideration of the arbitral jurisdiction, the judicial control required for its dentification exceeds the legally imposed prohibitions, as well as, the guiding principles of the arbitration process; with the exception of the assumption of non-existence of motivation, then, judicial control of the award is limited to the existence of arguments to justify the decision.
Description
Keywords
Defectos de motivación, Recurso de anulación, Laudos arbitrales, Naturaleza del arbitraje