Fernández Villacorta, Freddy JavierMorales Alzugaray, Jorge JulioMoreno Trujillo, Keleer Anderson2023-04-252023-04-252022-04-28https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/17076To determine the quality of life after arthroplasty or osteosynthesis in older adults with proximal femur fracture at the Trujillo Regional Teaching Hospital. Material and methods: Observational, prospective and cross-sectional study in the Orthopedics and Traumatology service of the HRDT. Eighty-four older adults with proximal femur fracture who had undergone arthroplasty or osteosynthesis were included. Quality of life was measured using the Short Form – 36. Results: Of the patients undergoing Arthroplasty, 76.19% had better quality of life and 23.80% had poor quality of life; within it in the physical area: physical role and pain were of greater relevance with means of 86.31 and 33.33 respectively; and the mental area: emotional role and mental health with means of 79.37 and 42.38. In the osteosynthesis group, 35.71% had better quality of life and 64.28% had poor quality of life; Within the physical area: physical function and pain were more relevant with means of 74.65 and 24.88, respectively; and the mental area: emotional role and mental health with means of 63.57 and 31.91. Conclusions: Patients undergoing arthroplasty obtained a better quality of life compared to osteosynthesis.Determinar la calidad de vida después de artroplastia u osteosíntesis en adultos mayores con fractura de fémur proximal en el Hospital Regional Docente de Trujillo. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, prospectivo y de corte transversal en el servicio de Ortopedia y traumatología del HRDT. Se incluyeron 84 adultos mayores con fractura de fémur proximal que han sido sometidos a artroplastia u osteosíntesis. Se midió la calidad de vida usando el Short Form – 36. Resultados: De los pacientes sometidos a Artroplastia, el 76.19% tuvieron mejor calidad de vida y el 23.80% tuvieron mala calidad de vida; dentro de ello en el área física: rol físico y dolor fueron de mayor relevancia con medias de 86.31 y 33.33 respectivamente; y el área mental: rol emocional y salud mental con medias de 79.37 y 42.38. En el grupo de osteosíntesis, el 35.71% tuvieron mejor calidad de vida y 64.28% presentaron mala calidad de vida; dentro del área física: función física y dolor tuvieron mayor relevancia con medias de 74.65 y 24.88 respectivamente; y el área mental: rol emocional y salud mental con medias de 63.57 y 31.91. Conclusiones: Los pacientes sometidos a artroplastia obtuvieron mejor calidad de vida comparada con la osteosíntesis.spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCalidad de vidaArtroplastiaOsteosíntesisAdulto mayorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis