El derecho a la intimidad y límites preventivos a la libertad de información en internet en el Perú
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
El motivo o finalidad de la presente investigación estribó en el análisis y explicación de cuáles son los fundamentos o razones para determinar la vulneración o afectación del derecho denominado a la intimidad cuando se publica información a través de redes sociales; para lo cual, se trazó como objetivos los de analizar y explicar cuál es el fundamento para determinar la vulneración del derecho a la intimidad cuando se publica información personal familiar en redes sociales, estudiar nociones de derecho fundamental de intimidad, estudiar el derecho fundamental a la información, analizar los alcances y límites del derecho a informar frente al derecho a la intimidad y el de analizar el tipo de protección que brindan las redes sociales para permitir realizar publicaciones, para ello se enfocó dentro del tipo de investigación descriptiva, y el diseño de investigación fue de corte no experimental, fijando la población en el universo de Fiscales y Jueces del distrito judicial del Santa y además los abogados de ejercicio libre vinculados al derecho constitucional, los cuales contaban con experiencia en el estudio y análisis de derechos fundamentales y como muestra cuarenta magistrados, distribuidos entre Fiscales y Jueces, como sesenta abogados libres relacionados con la defensa de derechos constitucional, dentro de la técnica utilizada podemos citar a la observación y entrevista, siendo el instrumento la guía de entrevista, los resultados que se obtuvieron fueron relacionados a las estadísticas sobre los procesos por vulneración del derecho a la intimidad tramitados en el distrito judicial del Santa, ello con la finalidad de poder conocer la cantidad de procesos, en materia penal, que se vienen tramitando así como el resultado de los mismos, también hemos podido consignar como resultado las respuestas brindadas luego de la aplicación de la guía de entrevista, habiendo obtenido respuestas que nos generaron la convicción que en el Perú es sumamente fácil mancillar la reputación de una persona por la divulgación de información o videos de contenido íntimo debido a que no existe un sistema de verificación de la identidad de los titulares de las cuentas de redes sociales. Las conclusiones a las que se llegaron fueron, que el derecho a la intimidad es un derecho fundamental de todas las personas, orientado a salvaguardar que situaciones o aspectos personales o de índole familiar no sean divulgados por terceras personas sin su debida autorización, el derecho a la información, es otro derecho fundamental importante que en muchos casos, colisiona con el derecho a la intimidad; por lo que, no se debe amparar en dicho derecho para divulgar información que solo concierne el ámbito personal o a la intimidad de una persona, con la masificación cada vez mayor del acceso a internet por parte de los ciudadanos, se ha dado origen al fenómeno de las fake news, las cuales están orientadas a propalar información falsa de una persona con la finalidad de mancillar su reputación, en el Perú cualquier persona puede divulgar información, a través de redes sociales, con el solo hecho de crearse una cuenta brindando datos de identificación falsos y que el Perú no cuenta con un sistema de identificación o verificación de los titulares de las cuentas de redes sociales que permitan conocer el nombre verdadero de quien sube contenido al internet.
The reason or purpose of this investigation was to analyze and explain the grounds or reasons for determining the violation of the right to privacy when information is published on social networks; For which, the objectives were to analyze and explain what is the basis for determining the violation of the right to privacy when information is published on social networks, study the fundamental right to privacy, study the fundamental right to information, to analyze the scope and limits of the right to inform against the right to privacy and to analyze the type of protection provided by social networks to allow publications, for this purpose it focused on the type of descriptive research, and the research design was of a non-experimental nature, setting the population in the universe of Prosecutors and Judges of the judicial district of Santa and also the free practice lawyers linked to constitutional law, who had experience in the study and analysis of fundamental rights and as a sample to forty magistrates, distributed between Prosecutors and Judges, and sixty free lawyers related to the defense of constitutional rights, all of them knowledge of fundamental rights, within the technique used we can mention the observation and interview, the instrument being the interview guide, the results obtained were related to the statistics on the processes for violation of the right to privacy processed in the judicial district of Santa, this with the purpose of being able to know the number of processes, in criminal matters, that are being processed as well as the result of the same, we have also been able to record as a result the answers provided after the application of the guide interview, having obtained responses that led us to the conviction that in Peru it is extremely easy to tarnish a person's reputation by disclosing information or videos of intimate content because there is no system to verify the identity of the holders of social media accounts. The conclusions reached were that the right to privacy is a fundamental right of all people aimed at safeguarding that personal or family situations or aspects are not disclosed by third parties without their due authorization, the right to information is another important fundamental right which, in many cases, collides with the right to privacy; Therefore, said right should not be protected to disclose information that only concerns the personal sphere or the privacy of a person, with the massification of Internet access, by citizens, the phenomenon of fake has been given rise. news, which are oriented to propagate false information about a person with the purpose of sullying their reputation, in Peru any person can disclose information, through social networks, with the mere fact of creating an account providing false identification data and that Peru does not have an identification or verification system for the holders of social media accounts that allow knowing the true name of the person who uploads content to the internet.
The reason or purpose of this investigation was to analyze and explain the grounds or reasons for determining the violation of the right to privacy when information is published on social networks; For which, the objectives were to analyze and explain what is the basis for determining the violation of the right to privacy when information is published on social networks, study the fundamental right to privacy, study the fundamental right to information, to analyze the scope and limits of the right to inform against the right to privacy and to analyze the type of protection provided by social networks to allow publications, for this purpose it focused on the type of descriptive research, and the research design was of a non-experimental nature, setting the population in the universe of Prosecutors and Judges of the judicial district of Santa and also the free practice lawyers linked to constitutional law, who had experience in the study and analysis of fundamental rights and as a sample to forty magistrates, distributed between Prosecutors and Judges, and sixty free lawyers related to the defense of constitutional rights, all of them knowledge of fundamental rights, within the technique used we can mention the observation and interview, the instrument being the interview guide, the results obtained were related to the statistics on the processes for violation of the right to privacy processed in the judicial district of Santa, this with the purpose of being able to know the number of processes, in criminal matters, that are being processed as well as the result of the same, we have also been able to record as a result the answers provided after the application of the guide interview, having obtained responses that led us to the conviction that in Peru it is extremely easy to tarnish a person's reputation by disclosing information or videos of intimate content because there is no system to verify the identity of the holders of social media accounts. The conclusions reached were that the right to privacy is a fundamental right of all people aimed at safeguarding that personal or family situations or aspects are not disclosed by third parties without their due authorization, the right to information is another important fundamental right which, in many cases, collides with the right to privacy; Therefore, said right should not be protected to disclose information that only concerns the personal sphere or the privacy of a person, with the massification of Internet access, by citizens, the phenomenon of fake has been given rise. news, which are oriented to propagate false information about a person with the purpose of sullying their reputation, in Peru any person can disclose information, through social networks, with the mere fact of creating an account providing false identification data and that Peru does not have an identification or verification system for the holders of social media accounts that allow knowing the true name of the person who uploads content to the internet.
Description
Keywords
Derecho a la intimidad, Derecho a la información, Redes sociales