Ausencia de controles jurisdiccionales de la prueba administrativa e inclusión procesal del extraneus al delito de negociación incompatible, Trujillo, 2020 – 2021
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
La tesis titulada “Ausencia de Controles Jurisdiccionales de la Prueba Administrativa e Inclusión
Procesal del Extraneus al Delito de Negociación Incompatible, Trujillo, 2020-2021” examina
detalladamente los controles jurisdiccionales en el sistema jurídico procesal, con un enfoque particular en
la gestión de pruebas en casos de negociación incompatible. El estudio destaca que la ley actual solo tipifica
la conducta unidireccional del funcionario que defrauda al Estado.
La investigación está organizada en cinco capítulos: i) Controles a la imputación durante el proceso penal;
ii) Participación criminal en delitos especiales; iii) Mecanismos de control en pericias extraprocesales; iv)
Mecanismos procesales para controlar la prueba en la investigación preparatoria y etapa intermedia; y v) La
tesis racionalista de la prueba. Se formula una hipótesis que será contrastada con la investigación.
El análisis se basa en una guía de análisis documental y expedientes judiciales. Finalmente, se presentan
conclusiones generales y específicas, junto con recomendaciones jurídicas y referencias bibliográficas
utilizadas en la investigación.
The thesis titled “Absence of Jurisdictional Controls of Administrative Evidence and Procedural Inclusion of the Extraneus in the Crime of Incompatible Negotiation, Trujillo, 2020-2021” examines in detail the jurisdictional controls in the procedural legal system, with a particular focus on the management of evidence in cases of incompatible negotiation. The study highlights that current law only classifies the unidirectional conduct of officials who defraud the State. The research is organized into five chapters: i) Controls on the accusation during the criminal process; ii) Criminal participation in special crimes; iii) Control mechanisms in extraprocessual expert reports; iv) Procedural mechanisms for controlling evidence during the preparatory investigation and intermediate stage; and v) The rationalist thesis of evidence. A hypothesis is formulated, which will be tested through the research. The analysis is based on a documentary analysis guide and judicial files. Finally, general and specific conclusions are presented, along with legal recommendations and bibliographic references used in the research.
The thesis titled “Absence of Jurisdictional Controls of Administrative Evidence and Procedural Inclusion of the Extraneus in the Crime of Incompatible Negotiation, Trujillo, 2020-2021” examines in detail the jurisdictional controls in the procedural legal system, with a particular focus on the management of evidence in cases of incompatible negotiation. The study highlights that current law only classifies the unidirectional conduct of officials who defraud the State. The research is organized into five chapters: i) Controls on the accusation during the criminal process; ii) Criminal participation in special crimes; iii) Control mechanisms in extraprocessual expert reports; iv) Procedural mechanisms for controlling evidence during the preparatory investigation and intermediate stage; and v) The rationalist thesis of evidence. A hypothesis is formulated, which will be tested through the research. The analysis is based on a documentary analysis guide and judicial files. Finally, general and specific conclusions are presented, along with legal recommendations and bibliographic references used in the research.
Description
Keywords
HUMANITIES and RELIGION::History and philosophy subjects::History subjects::History