Mejoramiento de la eficiencia del diseño de Sistema de Riego reduciendo el Consumo de energía Eléctrica Total diario del Sistema de bombeo
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
Pretendiendo reducir el Consumo de Energía en un Sistema de Riego, nace la idea de Modificar su Diseño para obtener una mayor eficiencia; Esto es en el Uso eficiente del Recurso Hídrico (Acuífero). Para ello se realizaron Pruebas de bombeo para obtener un nuevo Caudal de Trabajo, pero, al obtener un nuevo Caudal de bombeo también se modificó el caudal del gotero y Turnos de Riego. Fue necesario entonces un ensayo de bulbo de humedecimiento en la cual se observó que la humedad producida por el nuevo caudal de gotero está en el rango permisible de trabajo. En la Prueba de bombeo se observó Abatimiento y Recuperación, realizándose dos pruebas con diferentes caudales de bombeo; 8.18LPS y 11.0LPS, obteniendo datos satisfactorios, puesto que el nivel dinámico no sobrepaso el nivel permisible. Se determinaron Tiempos de Operación antes y después de modificar el Diseño del Sistema de Riego, de igual manera se obtuvo la Energía Eléctrica del motor Trifásico usando Método Directo y Teórico (Indirecto) Antes y Después de la modificación del Diseño. Con ellos se obtuvo el Consumo de Energía, llegando a la conclusión que al modificar el Diseño el sistema de Riego utilizando el nuevo Caudal de bombeo el Riego es más eficiente (Reducción de Tiempos de Riego Totales diarios) y el ahorro de Costo de Energía es considerable. La diferencia del Consumo de Energía Total por el método Indirecto o Teórico es de 5.8KW mientras que el Consumo de Energía Total por el método Directo es de 8.74KW.
ABSTRACT Pretending to reduce Energy Consumption in Irrigation System, the idea to Modify a design for greater efficiency; This is in Efficient Water Resources Aquifer ). This pumping tests were conducted to obtain a new job flow, but to get a new flow pump flow rate and dripper irrigation shifts are also modified. It was then necessary wetting bulb test in which it was observed that the moisture produced by the new flow dropper is in the allowable range. The pumping test was observed Abatement and Recovery, two tests performed with different pumping rates ; 8.18LPS and 11.0LPS , obtaining satisfactory data , since the dynamic level not surpassed the permissible level . Operating times were determined before and after changing the design of the irrigation system , just as the Electric Power Phase motor using Direct Method and Theory ( Indirect) was obtained before and after modifying the design . With them Energy Consumption was obtained , concluding that modifying the design the irrigation system using the new flow pumping Watering is more efficient ( reduction times of Total Watering daily) and Saving Energy Cost is considerable. The difference of Total Energy Consumption by Indirect or Theoretical method is 5.8KW while the Total Energy Consumption by the Direct method is 8.74KW .
ABSTRACT Pretending to reduce Energy Consumption in Irrigation System, the idea to Modify a design for greater efficiency; This is in Efficient Water Resources Aquifer ). This pumping tests were conducted to obtain a new job flow, but to get a new flow pump flow rate and dripper irrigation shifts are also modified. It was then necessary wetting bulb test in which it was observed that the moisture produced by the new flow dropper is in the allowable range. The pumping test was observed Abatement and Recovery, two tests performed with different pumping rates ; 8.18LPS and 11.0LPS , obtaining satisfactory data , since the dynamic level not surpassed the permissible level . Operating times were determined before and after changing the design of the irrigation system , just as the Electric Power Phase motor using Direct Method and Theory ( Indirect) was obtained before and after modifying the design . With them Energy Consumption was obtained , concluding that modifying the design the irrigation system using the new flow pumping Watering is more efficient ( reduction times of Total Watering daily) and Saving Energy Cost is considerable. The difference of Total Energy Consumption by Indirect or Theoretical method is 5.8KW while the Total Energy Consumption by the Direct method is 8.74KW .
Description
Keywords
Acuifero, Caudal, Bombeo