Efectividad de la anestesia raquídea y anestesia general en apendicectomía laparoscópica
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024-02-06
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
Determinar la efectividad de la anestesia raquídea y anestesia general en pacientes sometidos a apendicectomía laparoscópica. Material y método: Se seleccionó 120 historias clínicas de pacientes sometidos a apendicectomía laparoscópica (AL) de la Clínica Peruano - Americana comprendido del 1 de enero de 2018 al 31 de diciembre del 2019 y los datos fueron llenados en hojas de registros divididos en 2 grupos equitativos, tomando en cuenta el tipo de anestesia empleada, tiempo operatorio, estancia hospitalaria, náuseas, vómitos y cefalea. Resultados: Hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el promedio del tiempo operatorios empleado (p= 0,00000), estancia hospitalaria (p= 0.00003), náuseas y vómitos (p = 0.0168), sin embargo; no hubo diferencia significativa respecto a la cefalea en los pacientes que emplearon anestesia raquídea en comparación con la anestesia general. Conclusión: La anestesia raquídea fue más efectiva que la anestesia general en pacientes sometidos a AL en la Clínica Peruano – Americana comparando el tiempo operatorio, estancia hospitalaria, náuseas y vómitos.
Abstract Determine the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Material and methods: 120 medical records of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy from the Peruano - Americana Clinic from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 were selected and the data were filled out on record sheets divided into 2 equitable groups, taking into account the type of anesthesia used, operative time, hospital stay, nausea, vomiting and headache. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the average operative time spent (p= 0.00000), hospital stay (p= 0.00003), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.0168), however; there was no significant difference regarding headache in patients who used spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia was more effective than general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy at the Peruano -Americana Clinic comparing operative time, hospital stay, nausea and vomiting.
Abstract Determine the effectiveness of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. Material and methods: 120 medical records of patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy from the Peruano - Americana Clinic from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 were selected and the data were filled out on record sheets divided into 2 equitable groups, taking into account the type of anesthesia used, operative time, hospital stay, nausea, vomiting and headache. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the average operative time spent (p= 0.00000), hospital stay (p= 0.00003), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.0168), however; there was no significant difference regarding headache in patients who used spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia was more effective than general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy at the Peruano -Americana Clinic comparing operative time, hospital stay, nausea and vomiting.
Description
Keywords
Apendicectomía Laparoscópica, Anestesia Raquídea, Anestesia general, tiempo operatorio, estancia hospitalaria, náuseas, vómitos, cefalea, Tiempo Operatorio, Estancia Hospitalaria, Náuseas, Vómitos, Cefalea