Criterios delimitadores del principio de confianza para excluir la tipicidad del delito de negociación incompatible a través del sobreseimiento
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2023
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
En la presente tesis se abordó como problema de investigación de qué manera debe limitarse la aplicación del principio de confianza para excluir la imputación del delito de negociación incompatible, a través de un sobreseimiento. Para lograr determinar una respuesta a dicho problema, se trazaron como objetivos; estudiar la estructura típica del delito de negociación incompatible, analizar los orígenes y naturaleza del principio de confianza, los criterios de la jurisprudencia para limitar el principio de confianza y las solicitudes de sobreseimiento respectivamente, y constatar los principales lineamientos de división de trabajo en los diversos instrumentos normativos de gestión en el Perú. Finalmente, se procedió a la ejecución de dichos objetivos a través de los métodos: científico, deductivo, dogmático; logrando obtener como resultado, que la aplicación del principio de confianza para excluir la imputación del delito de negociación incompatible, a través de un sobreseimiento debe limitarse a través de los siguientes criterios: el cumplimiento de un rol determinado, la inexistencia de deberes de vigilancia, no debe advertirse en forma evidente la conducta incorrecta de un tercero, y finalmente, estos criterios deben presentarse de manera clara y evidente.
In this thesis, a research problem was addressed in which way the application of the principle of trust should be limited to exclude the imputation of the crime of incompatible negotiation, through a dismissal. In order to determine an answer to said problem, they were drawn as objectives; study the typical structure of the crime of incompatible negotiation, analyze the origins and nature of the principle of trust, the jurisprudential criteria to limit the principle of trust and requests for dismissal respectively, and verify the main guidelines for the division of labor in the various Regulatory management instruments in Peru. Finally we proceeded to the execution of said objectives through the methods: scientific, deductive, dogmatic; managing to obtain as a result, that the application of the principle of trust to exclude the imputation of the crime of incompatible negotiation, through a dismissal must be limited through the following criteria: the fulfillment of a certain role, the non-existence of vigilance duties, The incorrect conduct of a third party must not be noticed in an obvious way, and finally, these criteria must be presented clearly and evidently.
In this thesis, a research problem was addressed in which way the application of the principle of trust should be limited to exclude the imputation of the crime of incompatible negotiation, through a dismissal. In order to determine an answer to said problem, they were drawn as objectives; study the typical structure of the crime of incompatible negotiation, analyze the origins and nature of the principle of trust, the jurisprudential criteria to limit the principle of trust and requests for dismissal respectively, and verify the main guidelines for the division of labor in the various Regulatory management instruments in Peru. Finally we proceeded to the execution of said objectives through the methods: scientific, deductive, dogmatic; managing to obtain as a result, that the application of the principle of trust to exclude the imputation of the crime of incompatible negotiation, through a dismissal must be limited through the following criteria: the fulfillment of a certain role, the non-existence of vigilance duties, The incorrect conduct of a third party must not be noticed in an obvious way, and finally, these criteria must be presented clearly and evidently.
Description
Keywords
Negociación incompatible, Principio de confianza, Sobreseimiento, Proceso penal, Corrupción, Funcionario público