Estresores laborales y percepción de autoeficacia del cuidado humanizado en enfermeras asistenciales
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024
Authors
Vilca Zare, Danixa Aribel
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
Abstract
El presente estudio descriptivo correlacional, se realizó en enfermeras(os) del servicio de
medicina A y B del hospital Belén de Trujillo con el objetivo de determinar la relación entre
estresores laborales y la percepción de autoeficacia del cuidado humanizado. La muestra
estuvo constituida por 32 enfermeras, para recolectar los datos se aplicaron los instrumentos
Estresores Laborales de Enfermería (Nursing Stress Scale) y Percepción de Autoeficacia del
Cuidado Humanizado (Caring Efficacy Scale). Los resultados muestran que el 68% de
enfermeras(os) presentaron escasos estresores laborales. Respecto a los estresores por
dimensiones, se evidencia nivel medio para el ambiente físico con 43.8%, ambiente
psicológico con 46.9%, a diferencia del ambiente social con 96.9% que tuvo nivel escaso de
estrés laboral; mientras que el 96.9% tuvo autoeficacia media para el cuidado humanizado.
La prueba tau b de Kendall no evidencia relación significativa entre las variables de estudio.
No se encontró relación entre los estresores laborales y el cuidado humanizado brindado por
personal de enfermería.
The present descriptive correlational study was carried out on nurses from the A and B medicine service of the Belén hospital in Trujillo with the objective of determining the relationship between work stressors and the perception of self-efficacy of humanized care. The sample consisted of 32 nurses. To collect data, the Nursing Work Stressors (Nursing Stress Scale) and Humanized Care Self-Efficacy Perception (Caring Efficacy Scale) instruments were applied. The results show that 68% of nurses presented few work stressors. Regarding the stressors by dimensions, a medium level is evident for the physical environment with 43.8%, psychological environment with 46.9%, unlike the social environment with 96.9%, which had a low level of work stress; while 96.9% had average self-efficacy for humanized care. Kendall's tau b test does not show a significant relationship between the study variables. No relationship was found between work stressors and the humanized care provided by nursing staff.
The present descriptive correlational study was carried out on nurses from the A and B medicine service of the Belén hospital in Trujillo with the objective of determining the relationship between work stressors and the perception of self-efficacy of humanized care. The sample consisted of 32 nurses. To collect data, the Nursing Work Stressors (Nursing Stress Scale) and Humanized Care Self-Efficacy Perception (Caring Efficacy Scale) instruments were applied. The results show that 68% of nurses presented few work stressors. Regarding the stressors by dimensions, a medium level is evident for the physical environment with 43.8%, psychological environment with 46.9%, unlike the social environment with 96.9%, which had a low level of work stress; while 96.9% had average self-efficacy for humanized care. Kendall's tau b test does not show a significant relationship between the study variables. No relationship was found between work stressors and the humanized care provided by nursing staff.
Description
Keywords
HUMANITIES and RELIGION::History and philosophy subjects::History subjects::History